Question 1

What actually differs, if the feature lists look similar?

Accepted Answer

Commercials and depth. We price every component separately with no minimum commitment and no tier gating, and we run authoritative database validation and registry-grade ownership data in markets that are typically document-only elsewhere.

Question 2

How exactly do we migrate from Sumsub?

Accepted Answer

Four steps, and the first two commit you to nothing. One, take an instant sandbox key and build against the test catalogue, which publishes a working ID for every failure outcome. Two, export your already-verified customers and import them in bulk; they arrive with their verification status intact and immediately begin screening and monitoring, so nobody re-verifies. Three, run both platforms in parallel on live traffic and compare outcomes on your own users. Four, cut over by pointing the SDK, hosted link or API at us. A solutions engineer maps your existing approval rules into a workflow and stays on the parallel run, with no professional-services invoice attached.

Question 3

Is there a minimum commitment?

Accepted Answer

None. No annual contract, no platform fee and no capability held behind a higher tier. You pay per component for the checks that actually ran.

Question 4

How long until we are live?

Accepted Answer

Hours. Instant self-serve sandbox with a working test ID for every failure outcome, SDKs for every major platform, and hosted links that require no integration at all.

Question 5

Can we migrate our existing customers?

Accepted Answer

Yes, in bulk and with their verification status intact. They immediately begin screening and monitoring, so your back book is covered without asking anyone to verify again.

Question 6

How does regulatory filing compare?

Accepted Answer

Investigation cases produce goAML reports exported as filing-ready XML, with four-eyes separation enforced so the analyst who drafts a report cannot file it. That separation of duties is the thing auditors ask about.

Question 7

Can our compliance team change monitoring rules?

Accepted Answer

Yes, as configuration, and they can backtest a change against your own stored event history to see exactly which past events would have decided differently before it goes live.

Question 8

You are smaller. Why is that not a risk?

Accepted Answer

You get depth in the markets we serve, commercial terms without minimums, and direct access to the people who build the product rather than a tier of support you have to qualify for.

Question 9

What does the audit trail look like?

Accepted Answer

One customer record carrying every ID presented, every check, alert, case and decision on a single timeline, secured by a tamper-evident hash chain that proves no entry was altered or removed.

Feature
Costs and pricing	Per-component pricingincluded No minimum commitmentincluded Cheaper at the same volumeincluded Sandbox never chargedincluded	Higher total cost at the same volumenot offered Minimum monthly commitmentnot offered Tiered planslimited Per-module surchargeslimited
Commercial flexibility	Pay only for checks that runincluded No platform feeincluded Nothing locked behind a tierincluded	Modular optionsincluded Capability gated by tiernot offered Annual commitment typicalnot offered
Integration speed	Instant self-serve sandboxincluded Test ID for every failure outcomeincluded SDKs, hosted links and direct APIincluded	Trial availableincluded Sales-gated for several moduleslimited
Workflows and SDK	No-code workflow builderincluded Versioned, publish without a releaseincluded One SDK for every componentincluded Hosted link needs no integrationincluded	Flow builder availableincluded Separate SDKs per modulelimited Biometric re-auth not documentedlimited
Verification and biometrics	Face match 1:1included Active liveness, re-analysed server-sideincluded Chip authentication verified server-sideincluded Biometric re-authentication built inincluded Assurance level on every resultincluded	Face match 1:1included Active livenessincluded Chip authenticationincluded No assurance level returnednot offered
After onboarding	Transaction and session monitoringincluded Rules your compliance team writesincluded Investigation cases with SLA trackingincluded Perpetual re-verificationincluded Address presence verification & monitoringincluded	Monitoring availableincluded Casework availableincluded Rule changes not self-serve backtestedlimited
Regulatory reporting	goAML SAR and STR generationincluded Filing-ready XML exportincluded Four-eyes separation enforcedincluded	goAML export not documentedlimited Four-eyes separation not documentedlimited
The audit record	One customer record end to endincluded Tamper-evident hash chainincluded Versioned decision traceincluded	No tamper-evident audit chainnot offered Audit logs, not a sealed chainlimited
Coverage	190+ countries, 48 KYB, 200+ screening jurisdictions	Broad global coverage

The Sumsub alternative,same lifecycle,without tiers or minimums.

What you gainby moving.

Emerging markets as a home, not a long tail

No minimums, no tiers, no platform fee

Production in hours, not procurement cycles

Myaza Trust vs Sumsub,line by line.

Myaza Trust vs Sumsub,questions.

Test it on your own traffic,not on our table.