Question 1

Can you reach the same markets?

Accepted Answer

Document and chip verification covers 190+ countries, business verification 48, and screening 200+ jurisdictions, with authoritative database validation where that source exists. Coverage is not the trade-off.

Question 2

How exactly do we migrate from AiPrise?

Accepted Answer

Four steps, and the first two commit you to nothing. One, take an instant sandbox key and build against the test catalogue, which publishes a working ID for every failure outcome. Two, export your already-verified customers and import them in bulk; they arrive with their verification status intact and immediately begin screening and monitoring, so nobody re-verifies. Three, run both platforms in parallel on live traffic and compare outcomes on your own users. Four, cut over by pointing the SDK, hosted link or API at us. A solutions engineer maps your existing approval rules into a workflow and stays on the parallel run, with no professional-services invoice attached.

Question 3

Why does direct coverage matter?

Accepted Answer

Consistency, latency and the quality of the record you keep. A routed response is a payload you have to store, interpret and defend later. Ours lands on a structured customer record with an assurance level attached.

Question 4

What do we still have to build with an aggregator?

Accepted Answer

Monitoring, alert triage, case management, regulatory reporting and the audit trail that ties them together. With us those are configuration, not a roadmap.

Question 5

How do we evidence a decision months later?

Accepted Answer

Every approval runs through a versioned decision graph that records the branch that fired, on a record secured by a tamper-evident hash chain. Reconstructing that from provider responses after the fact is not the same evidence.

Question 6

Is monitoring included?

Accepted Answer

Yes. Transactions, logins and sessions scored against each customer's own behavioural baseline, with rules your compliance team authors and backtests without an engineering deploy.

Question 7

How is it priced?

Accepted Answer

Per component and itemised on every verification, with no minimum commitment and no platform fee. You can see exactly which checks ran and what each cost.

Question 8

How quickly can we start?

Accepted Answer

Sandbox credentials are instant and self-serve, with a working test ID for every failure outcome so you can build the error paths properly rather than guessing.

Question 9

What about business verification depth?

Accepted Answer

Registry lookup plus beneficial owners reconciled against the registry, anyone undisclosed flagged, each screened individually, and the submitter required to prove they are a named officer of the company.

Feature
Costs and pricing	Per-component pricingincluded No minimum commitmentincluded Cheaper at the same volumeincluded Sandbox never chargedincluded	Total cost depends on sources usedlimited Quoted per deploymentlimited Pricing not publishednot offered
Commercial flexibility	Pay only for checks that runincluded No platform feeincluded Nothing locked behind a tierincluded	Usage-basedincluded Compliance stack still yours to assemblenot offered
Integration speed	Instant self-serve sandboxincluded Test ID for every failure outcomeincluded SDKs, hosted links and direct APIincluded	Access typically sales-assistedlimited You store and reconcile responseslimited
Workflows and SDK	No-code workflow builderincluded Versioned, publish without a releaseincluded One SDK for every componentincluded Hosted link needs no integrationincluded	No visual flow buildernot offered API-first, you build the flownot offered No biometric re-authenticationnot offered
Verification and biometrics	Face match 1:1included Active liveness, re-analysed server-sideincluded Chip authentication verified server-sideincluded Biometric re-authentication built inincluded Assurance level on every resultincluded	Face match 1:1included Active livenessincluded Chip authentication not documentedlimited No assurance level returnednot offered
After onboarding	Transaction and session monitoringincluded Rules your compliance team writesincluded Investigation cases with SLA trackingincluded Perpetual re-verificationincluded Address presence verification & monitoringincluded	Monitoring limitedlimited Casework limitedlimited No scheduled re-verificationlimited
Regulatory reporting	goAML SAR and STR generationincluded Filing-ready XML exportincluded Four-eyes separation enforcedincluded	No goAML generationnot offered No filing workflownot offered
The audit record	One customer record end to endincluded Tamper-evident hash chainincluded Versioned decision traceincluded	No tamper-evident audit chainnot offered Provider responses, not one recordnot offered
Coverage	190+ countries, 48 KYB, 200+ screening jurisdictions	Aggregated data sources

The AiPrise alternative,same reach, butit owns the outcome.

What you gainby moving.

One record, not a pile of responses

Monitoring and casework are core

Decisioning with an audit trace

Myaza Trust vs AiPrise,line by line.

Myaza Trust vs AiPrise,questions.

Test it on your own traffic,not on our table.